|
FAQ’s on Facilities |
||
|
Q: What is the Facilities Master Plan and what does it mean for
students?
Q: How is the State of Ohio involved in the plan?
Q: Does the plan reflect local needs?
Q: How were decisions made about which buildings to rebuild and which to renovate?
Q: Why are some newer school buildings recommended for replacement while
older buildings are proposed to be renovated?
Q: Why do any schools have to be closed?
Q: How were implementation priorities set for the plan?
Q: Is there a way to comment on the plan? |
A:
The plan is a set of recommendations
representing a rare opportunity to upgrade outdated, deteriorating
facilities in Cleveland Metropolitan Schools. For students, the plan means
first-class buildings that meet high state standards, have access to the
latest technology and are designed to support the district’s
educational model. A:
The state’s involvement ensures that new or renovated schools built under Cleveland’s
plan meet the same standards as others built in the state. Once the plan
is approved by the Cleveland Board of Education and the Ohio School
Facilities Commission, the state will provide 23 percent of the total cost
of the plan, which is estimated at about $ million. A:
Yes. The plan was developed in partnership by the state and a CMSD team
that included district facilities experts, architects and construction
managers. The CMSD
team met with every school community to get input. In some cases, state
rules and standards were modified to take into account local concerns,
such as a building’s historical value. A:
First, conditions of all buildings were assessed in detail by the Ohio
School Facilities Commission (OSFC), the agency directing a state-wide
effort to upgrade all Ohio school buildings. If the assessment showed the
cost to renovate a building — keeping it the same size and basic design —
was more than two-thirds of the cost to replace it with a new building,
the OSFC generally recommended replacing it with new construction. In
certain compelling cases — such as buildings of significant historical value —
the state can agree that this rule would be waived. A:
Ironically, some 40- to 60-year-old buildings are more costly to renovate
than older ones. Part of the reason is that older buildings were built to
last for longer periods. These 1950s and 1960s buildings are engineered in
a way that makes it impossible to have sufficient ceiling space to
accommodate necessary ductwork for new air-conditioning systems,
electricity and sprinkler piping. A:
District enrollment has been
declining and is projected to continue to decrease by 10 percent over the
next ten years. Cleveland
Metropolitan Schools and the Ohio
School Facilities Commission have a responsibility to taxpayers to size
the plan to meet enrollment needs. But because the construction will occur
in phases, the plan can be revised if enrollment trends change. A: The two main factors were a building’s condition and the crowded conditions in many current facilities. Another consideration was minimizing disruption to students during the construction process. A: Absolutely! Community meetings on the plan will be held. |
|